The right product management tool can make or break your projects. While most can help you get the job done, some platforms may leave you banging your head against the desk if they force you to change the way you work to fit their methodology. This is one of the reasons product managers often look for Productboard alternatives.
Productboard is great at what it does, but it doesn’t hold up in an increasingly agile world. In this post, we’re breaking down why Productboard struggles to fit the needs of fast-moving, agile teams and how airfocus is the best Productboard alternative.
Why Look for Productboard Alternatives?
Productboard was founded in 2014. Since then, it has appeared among promising tech startups on the Forbes' Next Billion-Dollar Startups list and managed to secure a few hefty rounds of funding. They went from a small startup to a well-positioned product management competitor in a short time. Despite this, time hasn’t been kind to the platform.
As the product world moved on, Productboard stayed put. Productboard’s main selling point is still its roadmapping abilities, while most platforms now offer a wide range of product tools to make life easier and centralize the entire process. You would think this focus would make Productboard’s features simple to use, unfortunately, it’s just the opposite.
Here’s what Productboard users struggle with:
A complicated UI that feels complex and overwhelming, especially for smaller and agile teams.
Rigid roadmap visuals and limited prioritization options that mean Productboard struggles to fit the needs of agile teams, leading many teams to juggle multiple tools to get everything done.
A high price point that forces smaller teams with smaller budgets to look for a simpler, more flexible tool, like airfocus, which balances strategy, execution, and user experience.
Pain Points: Where Productboard Falls Short
We hear the same issues time and time again when we speak to product teams looking for Productboard competitors. Let’s break down some of those key pain points:
Steep Learning Curve
Adopting new product tools can cause significant delays, so the last thing you need is friction. Productboard’s wide feature set may look great on paper, but it’s difficult to get your head around everything in the beginning. Teams often need extensive onboarding to get to grips with Productboard, which slows down adoption and productivity.
Cluttered Interface
The biggest issue that slows down adoption is how cluttered Productboard’s interface feels. There’s a lot thrown at you all at once, which is overwhelming for new users and non-technical stakeholders. Important features and workflows are often buried in this clutter, requiring significant training to help product teams know where to look. Teams looking for a lightweight planning tool may want to look for Productboard alternatives.
Rigid Roadmap Visuals
Modern product teams need the flexibility to work their way, which is why it’s so surprising to see that Productboard still wants its users to work their way.
Productboard does offer a range of roadmap templates to fit different ways of working, but the customization options are limited. This leaves teams struggling to create effective roadmaps that reflect their processes.
Say your team wants to use an OKR-driven workflow. It can be difficult to include OKRs on the roadmap with the templates Productboard offers. It also makes it challenging to tailor views to different audiences, which can cause problems when communicating between stakeholders, marketing, and dev teams.
Limited Prioritization Flexibility
Good prioritization is crucial for agile teams looking to build value and remove fluff. Every product team has their own way of prioritizing, either using scoring models like RICE and MoSCoW, or their own custom criteria.
While Productboard does offer some built-in prioritization capabilities, they’re not very flexible. Product teams will struggle to use custom prioritization criteria, leading them to seek Productboard competitors that can support their way of working.
Too Complex for Small Teams
Productboard throws a lot at you from the very start. While it’s nice to know that it has plenty of cool features to play around with, they’re often not needed for startups or lean product teams.
Agile teams typically look for fast, intuitive tools that let them dive straight in. Productboard’s steep learning curve and enterprise-focused features make it challenging for agile teams to find what they need, creating friction that leads to productivity loss.
Expensive for Core Features
Small businesses simply don’t have the budget for multiple product management platforms, especially when they’re looking for a lightweight tool. Unfortunately, many crucial Productboard features, such as advanced integrations, feedback automation, and custom views, are locked behind a paywall.
Because of this, the cost of Productboard starts adding up quickly once you start adding extra features you need. Couple that with the inevitable need to pair Productboard with another product management tool, and you have an option that just doesn’t work for teams with smaller budgets.
Strategy Takes a Backseat to Feedback
Productboard shines when it comes to collecting and organizing user feedback, but it’s far from perfect. Due to the platform’s rigidity, teams can struggle to link features to overarching goals, OKRs, or strategic priorities. This leads to teams acting reactively, rather than giving them the ability to predict user pain points and solve them before release.
Productboard also has a habit of mixing up product and project terminology, making it more of an output-focused tool than an outcome-focused tool.
Why airfocus is the Best Productboard Alternative
Small, agile, and startup teams often struggle with Productboard thanks to its cluttered interface and complexity. airfocus removes all of that by offering a streamlined and user-friendly UI that makes finding key features simple.
We built airfocus from the ground up to help modern product teams who need customizable workflows, flexible roadmaps that adapt to different frameworks, and a range of prioritization models that can suit the most specific workflows.
Here’s what PM teams can expect when switching to airfocus:
A Frictionless Start for Every User
Seeing how users struggled to get to grips with Productboard, we wanted to make sure they could get started with airfocus with as little friction as possible.
No extensive onboarding required, no piles of documentation to read through, just open the platform and get straight to work. We even managed this without sacrificing advanced capabilities, so our more experienced users can still work with precision.
Smarter AI That Actually Saves Time
Productboard is experimenting with AI features, such as brief generation, feedback summaries, and feedback analysis. However, there’s little in the way of automation.
Modern product teams have come to expect AI-powered automation to help them eliminate tedious tasks and focus more on adding real value to their products. AI Assist for airfocus offers a wide range of built-in prompts and slash commands to help product teams boost productivity and save valuable time.
Fair Pricing, No Surprises
Productboard’s pricing is another key issue. A lot of key features are paywalled, and costs can quickly spiral out of control.
airfocus is different; we don’t want to burden our users with complex pricing and paywalled features. We offer plans for teams of all sizes, transparent pricing, and no unnecessary extras. Just pay for what you need!
Collaboration That Drives Alignment
Easy collaboration is crucial to maintain strategic alignment throughout the business. We know that dev teams, stakeholders, marketing, and customers need different views to understand how a project is progressing. That’s why we offer easily shareable roadmaps with multiple views, team comments, and all the integrations you could need to collaborate and communicate.
TLDR: Productboard vs. airfocus: Key Features
Here’s where airfocus has the upper hand over Productboard:
Roadmapping: Roadmapping is Productboard’s bread and butter, but airfocus lets you build effective roadmaps and export them in a range of views to align everyone around your product vision.
Prioritization: Lack of prioritization features is surprisingly common in product management platforms, but airfocus offers scoring frameworks, Priority Poker, user insights, and OKRs to help teams make better product decisions.
Feedback Management: Feedback management helps you understand what your customers need. Insights for airfocus makes it easy for product teams to gather crucial feedback all in one place.
OKRs: Not being able to connect OKRs to roadmaps can muddy the waters. airfocus lets you keep OKRs connected to roadmaps to improve alignment.
Capacity Planning: airfocus helps you plan scenarios and manage capacity for easy resource management.
According to our evaluation, airfocus is best suited to cover this full set of capabilities a modern product manager needs.
Feature Comparison: Productboard vs. airfocus vs. Other Alternatives
We’re obviously a bit biased in our belief that airfocus is the best Productboard alternative, but you don’t have to take our word for it!
Here’s a handy chart that compares Productboard vs. airfocus vs. other Productboard competitors.
| Feature | airfocus | Productboard | Monday.com | ProductPlan | Roadmunk | Dragonboat | Aha! | Craft.io |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use (Intuitive UI) | ||||||||
| Customizable Roadmaps | ||||||||
| Multiple Prioritization Frameworks | ||||||||
| AI-Powered Prioritization | ||||||||
| Collaboration Features | ||||||||
| Integrations (Jira, Trello, etc.) | ||||||||
| Automation & AI Insights | ||||||||
| Drag-and-Drop Editing | ||||||||
| Workflow Customization | ||||||||
| User Feedback Management | ||||||||
| Product Strategy Alignment Tools | ||||||||
| Pricing Transparency | ||||||||
| Scalability | ||||||||
| Mobile Accessibility | ||||||||
| Dedicated Customer Support | ||||||||
| GDPR & Security Compliance |
Defining Productboard alternatives
When it came to defining Productboard competitors, we looked at a few categories:
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
How does it help with discovery?
How does it help with prioritization?
How does it help with scaling teams?
How does it help with involving other team members?
What is their pricing like?
We chose to go beyond just feature-by-feature comparison and look at real-world, everyday problems that product managers face. From roadmapping to adapting to scaling teams, product managers need a platform that will support their ways of working now and in the future.
Keeping the aforementioned elements in mind, we looked through dozens of credible sources offering user ratings and user reviews on product management software. Among dozens, we've chosen the five most recognizable sources to conduct an investigation. These are the following sources:
Within these sources, we found the closest Productboard alternatives and compared them with one another through the scope of variables mentioned above. As a result of the investigation, we narrowed down the number of options and received 8 top Productboard alternatives:
Aha!
Canny
Clickup
Jira
Monday.com
Roadmunk
Pendo
Without further ado, let's explore Productboard alternatives and prove that Productboard is not the only product management tool worth using.
1. Aha! vs. Productboard
In their own words: “Anything is possible with the world's #1 product development software.”
Aha! was one of the first product management tools available. As a Productboard alternative, the tool offers unique roadmapping features coupled with a public ideas portal. It enables users to post and vote on various suggestions to gain insights into what is important to your user base. It’s built for large, often project-oriented enterprises.
Founded in: 2013
Based in: United States
Employees on LinkedIn: 300
Funding: bootstrapped
Website: www.aha.io
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
While Aha! does offer extensive sharing capabilities, their roadmaps are all timeline-focused. This provides little flexibility for product managers wanting to work with outcome-based roadmaps. You can still visualize your goals and objectives, but against a delivery timeline - meaning you would be operating as a project team, not a product team.
How does it help with discovery?
Aha! can support one section of the discovery process through the collection of feedback. They allow you to crowdsource feedback by using a voting mechanism. While this may give you insights as to the most desired ideas, they still don’t support an internal feedback management system, which leaves product managers to have to rely on popularity contests.
How does it help with prioritization?
Their feedback prioritization is quite extensive but fails to provide visibility over holistic problems.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Aha! is quite flexible in terms of supporting custom fields, providing teams at scale to customize it to their needs. Their reporting system is also quite substantial, which may help when reporting upwards.
How does it help with involving other team members?
Aha! has converted into different products - including Roadmaps, Create, Ideas, Develop, and Academy. The suite integrates well with each other, but its usability and UI is notoriously confusing and difficult to get around. It’s a very big toolbox after all.
What is their pricing like?
Aha! packages their product in four plans for “Roadmaps” and two for “Ideas”. “Roadmaps” starts at $59 per user per month, paid annually, and goes up to $149. “Ideas” is either $39 per user per month, paid annually, or $59. You’ll need both products to cover all of your product management activities.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
Enhanced backlog management
Flexible and customizable fields
Extensive tracking and reporting
Crowdsourcing and engagement with customers
Cons:
Roadmapping is Gantt chart only
Loaded with features you may not ever use
Feature management is through voting, not problems to solve
Hard learning curve
Rating
G2: 4.3 out of 5
Capterra: 4.7 out of 5
2. Canny vs. Productboard
In their own words: “Capture, organize, and analyze product feedback in one place to inform your product decisions.”
Canny’s original value prop began with collecting customer feedback and gaining deep insights. Over time, they’ve branched out into other product management areas, such as roadmaps and documentation.
Founded in: 2017
Based in: United States
Employees on LinkedIn: 30
Funding: bootstrapped
Website: www.canny.io
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
Canny claims to have a roadmapping function to “score and prioritize feature requests.” For those in product, the problem here can be easily identified: feature requests should not be scored and prioritized. We should be focusing on problems, not individual requests that come from users experiencing a particular pain point (unless you’re an agency, of course.)
That said, they do have a function to share their roadmap externally with customers, which is a plus if you prescribe to that train of thought.
How does it help with discovery?
Canny’s niche is gaining insights, which is one of the key components to the discovery process. That said, it’s difficult to set up a backlog management system connected to those ideas, and even harder to understand how those link into objectives.
How does it help with prioritization?
Canny offers a scoring framework, but it applies to the roadmap level. Pieces of feedback are directly linked to the roadmap, bypassing a backlog entirely. This sets in place one of the most persistent problems in the product world - prioritizing individual requests without understanding the problem at hand.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Canny helps teams in managing large volumes of feedback, however their focus is on voting and forums. As your team scales and differentiates it might be difficult to accommodate everyone’s needs.
How does it help with involving other team members?
Canny’s UI is really user friendly, and there should be little friction introducing it to team members and users alike.
What is their pricing like?
Canny offers three plans for their product. A free version, a $72 per user per month plan when paid annually, as well as a custom third tier. Notably, there is a 75% start-up discount for the first year.
Pros and cons
Pros:
Easy-to-use
Different integrations
Easy implementation
Numerous user feedback management options
Cons:
Restrictive set up for roadmaps
No portfolio roadmap view
Little to no understanding of product management practices beyond insights
Rating
G2: 4.4 out of 5*
Capterra: 4.3 out of 5**
*13 user reviews
**34 user reviews
3. Clickup vs Productboard
In their own words: “All of your work in one place: Tasks, Docs, Chat, Goals, & more”
Clickup is a recent contender in the product world. Their clear and concise marketing has won people over, with their use cases ranging from marketing, to operations, to product. They brand themselves as a productivity software company.
Founded in: 2017
Based in: United States
Employees on LinkedIn: 900
Funding: $537M
Website: www.clickup.com
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
Clickup’s sharing functionality is outstanding, and it’s easy to share with both internal and external customers.
That said, their roadmaps are all timeline-based/gantt charts, which fails to support the modern product manager. There is no option to create a Now/Next/Later roadmap, or focus on other ways of visualizing a portfolio.
How does it help with discovery?
Clickup has pretty flexible options when it comes to creating boards and views, but unfortunately collecting feedback or running a discovery track is not one of them. Like many other tools, its flexibility may allow you to hack around certain things, but as their main use case is not really to support that process, it may fail to scale. Their niche seems to be project-focused, not outcome-focused teams.
How does it help with prioritization?
Clickup allows for two types of prioritization - flags of importance from low to high, and story points. It’s important to keep in mind all prioritization is task-driven, acting more as a project tool than a product tool.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Clickup is great for scaling teams, fitting all kinds of budgets. They provide plenty of options for custom fields and personalization, making it easy to adapt to all team needs and sizes.
How does it help with involving other team members?
It’s UI is a delight and really easy to use, so expect minimum friction in adopting it with other teams.
What is their pricing like?
Clickup offers five tiers starting with a free plan followed by $5, $12, $19 per user per month, paid annually. There is a custom price tier on request.
Pros and Cons
Pros
Easy to use
Great UX
Easy sharing of boards and views
Cons
Does not support the product management use case
Does not support now, next, later roadmaps
Does not support gathering feedback
Rating
G2: 4.5/5
Capterra: 4.7/5
4. Jira vs. Productboard
In their own words: “The #1 software development tool used by agile teams”
Jira is a well known development tool, although they have branched out into supporting other teams, including support and product. Their bread and butter is software development, with over 3000 apps that help integrate with other processes such as product management.
Founded in: 2002
Based in: Australia
Employees on LinkedIn: 15.300
Funding: $210M (Secondary market) + $462M(IPO)
Website: www.jira.com
Data for Atlassian, Jira’s parent company
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
It’s important to note that while Jira does have some roadmapping capabilities, it does not allow sharing of roadmaps externally. Atlassian is big in keeping everything within its ecosystem, so anyone that needs to see the roadmap would need an account in order to access it.
Roadmaps are primarily timeline-based, although there is a way to create a Now, Next, Later roadmap. It offers the ability to dig down all the way to delivery (after all, it is a delivery tool) and drill down all the way down to the user story and task level, which may be a bit too specific for a product manager.
How does it help with discovery?
Jira is an output-focused tool primarily focused on helping software development teams, so it is difficult to set up a discovery track. You may be able to hack around it (like we all do in Jira!) by setting up a custom board that eventually connects to other projects, but this requires intricate knowledge of how to move things around, and admin access to other boards and sections of the app. This might also be hard to change later on.
How does it help with prioritization?
Jira’s prioritization options are quite extensive. You are able to set up anything your team needs. That said, the setup process is quite complicated and time-consuming, and will likely require an IT manager or admin to help set frameworks for various teams as needed.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Jira is probably one of the most scalable products because it is designed with that in mind. That said, remember it is not really meant to be used as a product management tool. It still requires knowledge of how to work around it, and that learning curve may be difficult for a lot of team members. It’s especially challenging for product managers without any prior Jira experience.
How does it help with involving other team members?
Jira, like all other Atlassian tools, has a variety of advanced permissions you can assign to various team members. Its well-known and difficult UI, though, tends to cause a lot of friction when it comes to evangelizing the product with business-facing team members such as marketing and sales.
A good product team must be able to work closely with their commercial teams, and if they refuse to adopt your product tool, cross-team work will just be that much harder.
What is their pricing like?
Jira is available at four different prices. $0, $7,50, $14,50 per user, per month (no matter if paid annually or monthly). Lastly, an enterprise tier, only available with annual billing from 801 users at $10,70 per user per month. The middle two tiers discount large user populations as well.
Pros and cons
Pros:
Great for agile development
Easy integration with third-party software with more than 3000 options available
Customization of forms, reports, timelines, and tables
Generally scales far and beyond
Cons:
It is not a product management tool
Time-consuming set up process
Confusing layout, configuration process and UI
Rating
G2: 4.2 out of 5
Capterra: 4.4 out of 5
5. Monday.com vs. Productboard
In their own words: “Boost your team’s alignment, efficiency, and productivity by customizing any workflow to fit your needs.”
Monday.com enables teams to operate collaboratively with workflows. It has become a leader in its own right for work and project management in general, allowing for various teams to set up their processes and speed up their work.
Founded in: 2012
Based in: Israel
Employees on LinkedIn: 1.600
Funding: $384M + $574M (IPO)
Website: www.monday.com
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
Much like Jira, Monday.com is not a product management tool. It is a generalist tool that may fit various use cases at any given time, but does not specialize in solving product-specific problems. With that in mind, the roadmaps they offer and timeline/gantt charts, but offers no flexibility to create an outcome-based roadmap.
They list their use cases as marketing, sales, operations and project management to name a few - but product management is not one of them. That said, its flexibility and low cost has attracted product managers in small teams with little to no budget available.
How does it help with discovery?
While you can set up a board to visualize discovery, the tool does require quite a deep knowledge of how to integrate various databases together in order to connect workflows. This can be quite time consuming, particularly when there is only one person in the team that knows how to execute on this task!
How does it help with prioritization?
Monday.com offers custom and flagged priorities, however, the only way to truly view them is via the main worksheet. Adjustments are difficult to make, especially when trying to set up a custom scoring. This makes it a very output-focused tool, falling short on the way product managers need to work.
How does it help with scaling teams?
As a generalist tool, Monday.com specializes in speeding up certain workflows for a small set of individuals. Your immediate team might be able to work with it while it remains small, but as you need to start rolling out more complicated processes and involve more stakeholders, it will fail to scale up effectively. Remember - its focus is not to support product teams, but rather support project teams in delivering and executing.
How does it help with involving other team members?
Monday.com’s usability is actually quite neat. Its UI is easy to use, but understanding its workflows can be complicated. You may be able to involve other team members, but as your team scales and grows, that collaboration will become more and more difficult.
What is their pricing like?
Monday.com offers five different prices. It’s most basic version is free, followed by $8, $10, $16 and a custom price, respectively. All per user, per month, billed annually.
Pros and cons
Pros:
Customizability and visual ease
Easy monitoring
Great tool for project management, sales and ops teams
Cons:
They do not specifically support product management as a use case
Integrations and automation are inaccessible for the Basic pricing plan
Rating
G2: 4.7 out of 5
Capterra: 4.6 out of 5
6. Roadmunk vs. Productboard
In their own words: “The end-to-end roadmapping tool. Capture customer feedback. Prioritize what to build next. And use boardroom-ready roadmaps to communicate your strategy.”
The Canadian startup Roadmunk began as a roadmap solution only, and over time expanded their offering to backlog and feedback management. Their core strength is roadmapping with customization options around it.
Founded in: 2012
Based in: Canada
Employees on LinkedIn: 60
Funding: $1,7M (bought by Tempo at an undisclosed price)
Website: www.roadmunk.com
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
Roadmunk has an extensive roadmap template library, from outcome-based roadmaps to timelines - it literally has it all. There’s over 50 templates available! These roadmaps are easy to share, and come in formats such as CSV, PNG, HTML and publishing to a URL.
How does it help with discovery?
Roadmunk is heavy on prioritization, but seems to lack discovery-focused work. They don’t really call out anything as part of their value prop, but do highlight that they can assist with “committing to ideas” (for better or for worse, depending on how you see that).
They do however have a portal and feedback inbox, although there is a lack when it comes to setting up a set of custom workflows to manage insights. There are only two statuses available: “New” and “Processed” - but nothing in between. While it’s a good first go, it would fail scaling upwards as more teams (and team members) get involved.
How does it help with prioritization?
Roadmunk coins its prioritization workflows “customer-driven” - offering two frameworks available: impact v effort and RICE. It also contains other output focused data points, like time estimations and revenue. If you use either framework, you might find that it suits your needs just fine. However, if you want something custom that can be adopted across your teams, you may find it too restrictive.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Roadmunk is great for small teams looking to kick off their product management practices, but some of its restrictive processes means it would fail to scale upwards. Setting up additional prioritization frameworks beyond RICE is also tricky, and they force you to stick with what they know best.
How does it help with involving other team members?
The UI is not particularly difficult to use, but it fails to “delight.” It is easy to mention other team members and collaborate, which is a bonus.
What is their pricing like?
Roadmunk offers four price tiers starting at $19 per user per month, billed annually. The second and third tiers are $49 and $99 respectively. The last tier is on request only.
Pros and cons
Pros:
Vast roadmap template library
Clean UI
Has a feedback portal
Cons:
Costly for small teams
No flexibility for feedback management
No scaling options
Rating
G2: 4.1 out of 5
Capterra: 4.4 out of 5
7. Pendo vs. Productboard
In their words: “Helping you deliver better product experiences for happier and more productive users.”
Pendo is a great product experience platform with an emphasis on in-depth insights and analytics into distinct customer behaviors. With Pendo you can collect customer requests and store them in one place, as you define how you might prioritize things later.
Founded in: 2013
Based in: United States
Employees on LinkedIn: 1.000
Funding: $470M
Website: www.pendo.io
How does it help with roadmapping and sharing roadmaps?
Pendo unfortunately fell into the trap of only presenting roadmaps as timelines, which once again puts product managers in a position of having to commit to deadlines without running discovery. They don’t work with the concept of an idea backlog, attaching all feedback to roadmap initiatives directly. This bypasses the ability to understand problems holistically, and puts product teams in a build trap.
How does it help with discovery?
Pendo has extensive product analytics features, which is key to decision making for any data-informed team. They also have a lot in the way of feedback management. That said, they don’t have a backlog functionality, which means it lacks both top down and bottom up product management approaches, with only the outlying processes being supported. Their backlog is made up of a mixture of requests and initiatives, creating no differentiation between what are legitimate opportunities to be discovered.
How does it help with prioritization?
Feature requests can be assigned individual value points, which then sets a priority within the initiative. However, this still sets the product team in a position where they are managing individual requests and solutions as opposed to looking at opportunities and problems to solve.
How does it help with scaling teams?
Pendo’s main focus is enterprise and SMB’s, so their scaling functionality is quite extensive for their analytics and engagement layers. That said, as it lacks in the roadmapping area, it wouldn’t really scale up as needed.
How does it help with involving other team members?
Pendo’s UI is a bit tricky to use and navigate, given that it’s primarily for the technically inclined. It would be a bit harder to bring in commercial-focused team members. However, the amount of data they are able to present is neat, so you shouldn’t have a hard time convincing others to join!
What is their pricing like?
Pendo offers four price tiers. Prices are on request only, however. User reviews suggest that a medium-sized business can pay up to $12,000 per year in the second tier.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
Extensive analytics
Advanced engagement and feedback layer that integrates with your product
A variety of reports and views to visualize data
Cons:
Only offers a timeline
No now, next, later roadmap
No portfolio view
No backlog or feedback workflows
Rating
G2: 4.5 out of 5
Capterra: 4.5 out of 5
Choosing the Right Product Management Tool for Your Team
Modern product teams need a product management tool that fits with their workflows, not the other way round. Key features you should look for in Productboard alternatives include:
Simple to use with smooth onboarding
A streamlined user interface
Customizable roadmap visuals
A wide range of prioritization scoring models and customization
Budget-friendly, transparent pricing
A focus on strategy to help teams anticipate, plan for, and solve user issues before they become a problem
Ultimately, the “right” product management tool for your business will be the one that aligns with your business objectives and boosts productivity from day one.
Get Started with airfocus Today
airfocus is the best Productboard alternative with all the features you need at a price you’ll love. Get started with airfocus today!
Andrea Saez
Read also
Experience the new way of doing product management
Experience the new way of doing product management